KLAX

[porterjet]

Can someone else pull up KLAX and see if SIA 37 is at the top of the departed list? Not sure why it would be there. It landed in Singapore over 5 hours ago.

[im4point]

@porterjet

Can someone else pull up KLAX and see if SIA 37 is at the top of the departed list? Not sure why it would be there. It landed in Singapore over 5 hours ago.

It is.

[porterjet]

Thanks, I never know if it’s my computer or Houstons.

[mduell]

They departed at 12/21/2009 04:21:00 with an ETA of 12/21/2009 00:37:00 and we didn’t like that.

[pika1000]

@mduell

They departed at 12/21/2009 04:21:00 with an ETA of 12/21/2009 00:37:00 and we didn’t like that.

Spoiled much???

That is one of the funniest explanations that I have heard from you in a while Mark…

[dadalope]

@mduell

They departed at 12/21/2009 04:21:00 with an ETA of 12/21/2009 00:37:00 and we didn’t like that.

Confused by this. Arrival time before departure time is what you get going east across the intl dateline (SIN-LAX), right?
For LAX-SIN, I’d expect something like 12/21/2009 04:21:00 to 12/22/2009 11:37:00.

[mduell]

@dadalope

@mduell

They departed at 12/21/2009 04:21:00 with an ETA of 12/21/2009 00:37:00 and we didn’t like that.

Confused by this. Arrival time before departure time is what you get going east across the intl dateline (SIN-LAX), right?
For LAX-SIN, I’d expect something like 12/21/2009 04:21:00 to 12/22/2009 11:37:00.

The times are all UTC, so ETA should never be before departure time. We know the FAA has some issues with midnight passing (bouncing back a day… or forward two) and we’ve got code to deal with that but it didn’t work quite right in this case.