Can we get a who, what, where, when, why, and how on this?
Thanks for stating the obvious.
Who does the plane belong to? Do we know if it is blocked?
I defer to the FA Gurus…
Interesting bug. We’re looking into why you can see the map, but the tracklog is blank, and why you view it but can’t link to it or navigate to it.
pika is probably confused since the link doesn’t seem to work. flightaware.com/live/flight/N20TL works.
Nice. You try to help a guy out by trying to get information other than the obvious when, as Mark pointed out, the link provided doesn’t work, an you get called names…
Oh well, life goes on…
Pika: It’s not unlike feeding a bear - give the bear good food and he will still bite your fingers.
Because I could…
No, really, it’s because in 99.99999999999999999999999999999999999% of the cases, when you have a statement such as “And thanks for being a ,” the blank isn’t something nice.
Putting blanks in the middle of your thoughts and then blaming other for putting words in your mouth is one of the dumbest things I have heard here in a long while.
Makes you look like a <blank.>
And by “blank” I mean fool.
In all fairness, it was up for interpretation. I interpreted you giving the answer you did, which can be found in the link you originally provided, was a “smart a$$” answer. Therefore, smart a$$ comments get a smart a$$ reply. You probably didn’t know that your link didn’t work at that time.
To be totally honest, it was the reply I gave you or “Thank you Captain Obvious”. I opted for the more tactful version, for once. As far as the, again interpretation here, “fill in the blank”, I figured it wasn’t nice. I gotta side with dami and Newark on their thoughts on the “fill in the blank”. Seems more like an easy way out to me.
No, I didn’t. Was just asking an honest question and couldn’t figure out why you were giving me a hard time about it.
To be totally honest, it was the reply I gave you or “Thank you Captain Obvious”. I opted for the more tactful version, for once. As far as the, again interpretation here, “fill in the blank”, I figured it wasn’t nice. I gotta side with dami and Newark on their thoughts on the “fill in the blank”. Seems more like an easy way out to me.
It was an easy way out, but I wasn’t interested in taking the low road, so, as you did, chose the more tactful version as well.
Your humorous abilities blow me away.
as does your maturity. BTW, impressive collection of clips, you must spend hours collecting them. But I guess someone who makes almost 1000 posts in a year on this board has plenty of spare time.
Now THAT is funny…
He thinks this is a “professional” board! Oh, man. That has to be, already, the quote of the year!
And yet another poster blows a gasket! Some poeple are wound tight.
Reminds me of the scene in Talladega Nights, when Ricky Bobby and his buddy Cal continually responds to the French guy Jean Girard " Shake and Bake" over and over. Drove him nuts.
That movie was so ( fill in the blank ) that I thought I would ( fill in the blank ). Please, fill in the blanks correctly.
Was it something we said?
http://www.canmag.com/images/front/movies20063/talladega7.jpg
Quick! Someone call the Internet Police (IP). Here’s an obvious case of the Internet Vandals (IC) stealing the last part of Mr. CAFlier’s sentence. We all know that “not” is an adverb and an adverb needs an object.
If Newark777 has almost a thousand postings in a year then that means he has a lot of spare time. I have even more spare time, then, considering that have nearly double the number of postings in just a little bit longer period of time.
You know what? A large number of postings does not mean that one has a lot of spare time! Instead, it means that one is able to type fast and furiously in a short period of time. That’s my story and I’m a-stinkin’</southern drawl> to it!