I will probably add UAT to my setup soon. I am using a Pi 3B+ with the blue FA dongle, SAW filter and FA antenna. To start I would probably use the Orange dongle, no filter, and a homebrew antenna.The closest (buy) GA airport is about 5 miles away. ADSB traffic from there is mostly exec jets/turbo-props and training flights.
My Piâs CPU utilization gets up to 40% on busy days. From reading the above thread UAT doesnât have much traffic and so wonât add much CPU load - is this correct?
Is there a way to operate the 1090 and 978 systems on two different processors but combine the results into a single FlightAware site? Or must I run the two SDRs on a single processor?
An alternative method is linked below, but requires lot of manual commands, and therefore I dont recommend it. Using combine1090 noted above is much easier.
Look into the receiver-type other and uat-receiver-type other piaware config options; these let you point piaware at a network data source rather than a local SDR.
That wonât work well, the infrastructure assumes there is only one piaware with a given feeder ID; youâll get some strange effects if youâre feeding with the same feeder ID from more than one instance.
The 1090 is an AirSpy mini at 20 MHz on a Pi4 Itâs busy at 75% of a core so Iâd prefer to leave the 978 on its own Pi 3. Both Pi are connected via the same Ethernet network switch. .
I am looking to add UAT to my current setups. I have been trying to figure out how to add a second antenna (All my sites currently have the FA 1090 antenna, and I purchased a FA 978 antenna for testing). New antenna mounts to hold them apart, new cable runs, all that is getting to be a bit much since they are all up on masts.