FlightAware Discussions

Same Setup/location total different results

Could have figured that out for myself :wink:
Will try that tomorrow

1 Like

Have you looked at the “do I need a filter posts”?
The gain setting looks pretty low.

But shouldn’t that belong to both installations? The other one on the same roof works fine, also without filter and with a gain setting of 35

1 Like

Correct. The filter is something to look at later.

Are the RPIs or dongles close to each other? They both generate noise. I have my RPIs and dongles in metal cases. I found it reduced noise.

I am curious as to why you stopped the gain testing at 20db. I would have continued until the reception dropped.

I used one of the scripts provided here in the forum. And that one stopped at 20.7
Optimize-Gain-dump-fa-on-Raspbian-Jessie

Starts like this, and as I’m not a Linux “pro” i decided better not to mess with the script

  #!/usr/bin/python2
import time, socket, subprocess, fileinput, os

measure_duration = 62  #duration of one pass, seconds
ntests = 5   #number of tests
gains = "20.7 22.9 25.4 28.0 29.7 32.8 33.8 36.4 37.2 38.6 40.2 42.1 43.4 43.9 44.5 48.0 49.6".split()
#gains = "20.7 22.9 25.4 28.0 29.7 32.8 33.8 36.4".split()
#gains = "36.4 38.6 40.2 42.1 44.5 48.0 49.6".split()
1 Like

@flieger28

FULL RANGE of gain (0.0 to 49.6) in the top gain line. All partial gain lines are commented out.

#!/usr/bin/python2
import time, socket, subprocess, fileinput, os

measure_duration = 62  #duration of one pass, seconds
ntests = 5   #number of tests
gains = "0.0 0.9 1.4 2.7 3.7 7.7 8.7 12.5 14.4 15.7 16.6 19.7 20.7 22.9 25.4 28.0 29.7 32.8 33.8 36.4 37.2 38.6 40.2 42.1 43.4 43.9 44.5 48.0 49.6".split()      
#gains = "20.7 22.9 25.4 28.0 29.7 32.8 33.8 36.4 37.2 38.6 40.2 42.1 43.4 43.9 44.5 48.0 49.6".split()
#gains = "20.7 22.9 25.4 28.0 29.7 32.8 33.8 36.4".split()
#gains = "36.4 38.6 40.2 42.1 44.5 48.0 49.6".split()
1 Like

Will try that.
I just put the better performing Pi to the position of the bad one.
He performs better. The bad one received 12 planes. The one i put now on the same antenna and FA Stick get’s 55

1 Like

I guess i figured it out. In one of the Topics here i found out that it would be smart to enlarge the base of the antenna. Because the Antenna is on the chimney and that part is out of metal, that should be the reason for the better results. Just running the test script for the other pi, to see which gain ist best for that one.

For Pi (bad) 20.7 seems best

gain Messages positions planes
49,6 2 0 1
48 2 0 1
44,5 318 0 2
43,9 330 0 3
43,4 380 0 4
42,1 300 4 3
40,2 55 1 4
38,6 23 3 2
37,2 54 9 1
36,4 9 0 2
33,8 308 0 4
32,8 259 0 4
29,7 1819 30 10
28 1318 13 8
25,4 2392 60 12
22,9 3270 154 13
20,7 4114 168 17
19,7 2903 100 15
16,6 3128 103 13
15,7 4001 128 13
14,4 3283 101 10
12,5 2341 77 9
8,7 1111 26 10
7,7 628 16 5
3,7 157 2 3
2,7 132 4 3
1,4 13 0 1
0,9 90 0 1
0 54 0 1
1 Like

After i put the “bad” Pi also on the chimney

1 Like

regarding the gain test.

  1. pick the time with most traffic for your area eg day/noon with more that 10 aircraft.
  2. remember to re-run the test with ANY change in configuration receiver, dongle, antenna, software.
1 Like

I’ll tried to improve the receiver further.
Cost 2€

Also the range is greatly improved

Consider @abcd567 's post on tuning the antenna length for better reception

A tuned antenna is similar to adding a band pass filter without adding any loss.

Be aware of electrical interference. I have one device in our bedroom, behind a dresser with a TV on it. When the TV is on, reception noticeably decreases. This is with a cavity filter on the coax too.

Would be not so smart to cut this antenna. It is one that is allready made für 1090 Mhz and it performs well

I would not believe them. I have seen hundreds of the same exact antenna advertised for particular frequencies.
It looks exactly like a few I have.
I did a quick search on RG174 and the specs, on two sites, say Maximum frequency 1Ghz.
How does it look on an antenna analyser?

1 Like

Maybe you are right.
But i also have a regular DVB-T Antenna which came with one of my first sticks. Also i cut this one to 6,9cm it comes nothing near to the results of the antennas which i posted.

This is the Data of one of my Pi with the Antenna from the Ebay Link
I’m pretty satisfied with that results.

Unfortunately i don’t have the knowledge nor the equipment to check if the Antenna works like advertised.

If it works well then stick with it.

Your recent upgrades seem to have made significant improvements.

Are you using Mutability dump1090 1.15?
The newer FA version seems to get more aircraft, from memory.
It also has more aircraft image types.

@flieger28
Did you try Quick Spider?
It costs pennies, and is easy to make.
It may possibly improve. No harm in trying.

https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/three-easy-diy-antennas-for-beginners/16348/8

The only drawback is that you will need a pigtail or adapter to connect RG6 coax to your Dongle:
F-female to MCX-male for generic DVB-T
F-female to SMA-male for Flightaware ProStick.

F-male to MCX-male Pigtail

.
F-female to SMA-male Pigtail

Your recent upgrade seem to have made significant improvements.
Are you using dump1090 1.15?

The newer FA version seems to get more aircraft, from memory.

Tweaked a little bit further.
1.Red line is starting point.
2.Green is after i put the antenna a bit higer
3.Grey is even higher but a different antenna (has some rust on it)
4. Yellow Maybe 10 cm higher than 3, same antenna like in 1 and 2. And i fixed the antenna only with cable ties, in 3 i uses a metal Plate with a clamp.