Hello. On the flight map, you have the option of displaying the waypoints for the planned route; however, these waypoints appear as black dots.
Would it be possible to associate these black dots with waypoint names? This would allow people to see not only the black dot but also the name of that black dot.
I don’t even understand this feature. Those black dots don’t even correspond to waypoints… I used to think they did, but I just tested a flight that has 3 waypoints and a STAR in the flightplan, and the route shows about 30 black dots… Noticed this for awhile, never understood it hah.
It would be nice if the projected route (the blue, dashed lines) matched the actual route. It’s interesting to follow a flight from Europe to the U.S. and notice how many times the projected route changes. Sometimes, these changes are very large and seem to be completely random. Another interesting thing to notice for these types of flights is that the displayed waypoints in the Route section are INCORRECT. It seems as though FlightAware uses routes from previous flights to fill the gaps.
This random and erroneous information needs to be stopped. It seems like every flight-tracking Web site displays information just to attract people to that Web site; aesthetics are the main objective while accuracy takes a back seat.
I dream of a flight-tracking Web site that displays accurate flight-plan information…
I dream of a time when flight-tracking Web sites like FlightAware and Flightwise are merely a thing of the past…
This route, however, does not reflect the actual route of the aircraft, as can be seen on the tracker display. To verify, copy and paste the above route into simroutes.com (use the Generate Routes tab near the top of the page).
mduell explained above that, “the textual route is frozen at departure time,” so I don’t think there is any anomaly. The text route is the original route and the waypoints/route/etc on the map are constantly updating.
Okay… so, on this link (flightaware.com/live/flight/DAL5 … /EHAM/KMEM), you will see that there is a textural route displayed for DAL595 for tomorrow. My question regarding this is how does FlightAware know what tomorrow’s route will be when the actual route for DAL595 hasn’t even been filed?
Probably the wrong thread to ask this, but any particular reason that on international flights we cannot use the Aviation Sectional view mode? I understand it’s only available for the US/some of Canada, but is still of great use when tracking Intl flights during their departing/arriving phase in North America, especially when their routes have been altered from the textual planned route as we have been discussing.
And another question is why do the textural routes not show the complete route for certain flights? An example is UAL48 (flightaware.com/live/flight/UAL4 … /KEWR/VABB). This is the route:
This route ends at the the waypoint WT, and WT is 2,700 nautical miles away from the destination, so it is unlikely that UAL48 was planned to go direct from WT to VABB.
Yeah I see this a lot on longhaul flights. Sometimes it shows the full route other times not… must be an issue with the plans that come in from the FAA.