Now, i wouldnt use the weather data on FA for critical use (flying) but I would hope if its there it would be ‘reasonably’ accurate.
Looking at EGGW and EGHI this morning for tracking purposes I thought the dates on the reports a little odd? flightaware.com/live/airport/EGGW
and
I hope the pages appear as I have seen them at 1050z on the 11th, the met observations (metar) appear as 27th Aug 2006 and 30th Sept 2005 respectively. Heathrow too shows CB activity with an old date but sitting here in beautiful CAVOK conditions.
Q. How does the data appear to be so out of date, if its that old better to put no report received? You wouldnt want to plan a BBQ based on whats shown…
It does beg the question why bother to put it in if its so completely innaccurate (disclaimers notwithstanding) and that you dont support it (understandable).
In very simple terms is the design of the web page a ‘template’ and needs something to complete the data?
Not a big issue in the scheme of things, I trust the US wx is accurate…