Continuing the discussion from Can't find an answer :
In the above linked thread the OP had a discrepancy between the displayed messages/second of ~100, so roughly 4% (though it’s never stated what tar1090 was actually displaying).
I seem to have a discrepancy closer to 500 messages/second, where:
tar1090: ~1800 messages/second
graphs1090: ~1300 messages/second
So a discrepancy of roughly 30%.
Is this still expected?
(I’m using the Ultrafeeder docker container, if that is relevant)
It looks like PiAware SkyAware agrees more closely with graphs1090, compared to tar1090.
tar1090: ~1350 messages/secondPiAware SkyAware: ~1050 messages/secondgraphs 1090: ~1050 messages/second
Below, the tar1090 and PiAware SkyAware screenshots were taken at exactly the same time. The graphs 1090 graph was saved roughly 30 seconds later.
Am I the only one that sees this? Is this expected?
system
August 19, 2024, 7:01pm
3
This topic was automatically closed 365 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
