Which tends to be better? Using a longer antenna with the dongle plugged directly into the Pi/computer or using an USB extension cable?
I assume having the dongle plugged directly into the Pi/computer removes one failure point. But, it seems it might be easier to run CAT5/6 cable rather then sourcing a well made antenna cable.
The USB cable has voltage drop that might affect the dongle and, not being shielded, it becomes an antenna - data can be corrupted by noise
The receiver performance is influenced by the thermal noise. Keeping the receiver in a conditioned space yields better results.
For coax there are available lightning protectors (gas discharge type). Those are not avail for USB or CAT5.
IMO antenna followed by filtered LNA and coax is the best way to transmit the signal at long distance. My case is 45 meters away, with cheap RG-6 cable.
If youâre Raspi will have access to wifi, then both should be short - make your power cable long and use a $1 DC-DC converter to provide a stable 5.1V into the Raspi from a 12V source. If youâre using just antenna+cable+dongle (no LNA), then you want that cable as short as possible to maximize your receiver range. Long USB cables are also not a good idea for the reasons mentioned above.
Thereâs a separate thread on DC-DC converters. 12V AC adapters and power extension cables are common / cheap because of webcams.
While longer wire is never great for anything, the signal lost from an analog signal (radio) vs digital (USB) would make me want to have a long USB cable (like 50ft long in my case) if I have to have a long wire somewhere. The USB is for the most part is either going to work or not work. The lost to analog will be harder to see and correct . A fair number of active USB cables make the voltage drop moot.
Instead of buying an active USB cable one might just as easily buy the rtl-sdr LNA.
Then you can use RG6 or other relatively cheap coax (i still wouldnât want more than 10 dB attenuation for the length of the cable).
But i think in this case the author wasnât talking 50 ft but rather 5 ft.
In which case i would just use 5 ft of coax and be done with it, thatâs really not a problem.
Get some LMR240 or CFD200 or LMR195 and attenuation for runs up to 25 ft will be quite small.
After that using more expensive LMR400 cable still gets you acceptable levels of attenuation.
Anyway either you keep the coax quite short or you get really god quality coax or you use an LNA.
Itâs that simple.
Always best to check the data sheet of the individual product you are intending to buy.
You have a bit additional attenuation due to 75 Ohm if iâm not mistaken, but thatâs not per length of cable?
Also if you have F connectors with adapters, that will also add a little bit.
You should bear in mind that âRG-6â is not a very tight specification of cable. It says nothing about how it will perform in any particular application.
Take RG-6, for example. The only thing one can say generally about RG-6 type coaxes is that they have an 18 AWG center conductor. An RG-6 might be a cheap generic CATV coax, designed strictly for economy, with a thin aluminum braid and a copper-coated steel center conductor; it might be a better-grade CATV coax, with an aluminum âquad shieldâ arrangement; or it might be a precision serial digital video coax like Belden 1694A, with a dense copper braid and double-foil shield, solid copper center conductor, nitrogen-injected PE foam dielectric, and extremely broad bandwidth and tight impedance tolerance. When people ask, âcan I just use RG-6 for this application,â the only correct answer is a question: what do you mean by âRG-6â? High-bandwidth serial digital video and cable TV distribution may both use RG-6 type cable, but that doesnât mean that the cable for one is necessarily suitable for the other.
In short, donât buy cheap and nasty cable, buy decent quality from a reputable manufacturer. It might be cheaper to buy some kind of RG-6 than LMR-240 or whatever, but if you get something made to minimal cost, you might as well use a piece of wet string.
True, but this is true for LMR, as well as all other types of coax also.
The only way to find out quality of any type of coax is to go for a good manufacturer, and check manufacturerâs specs.
I feel the prejudice against RG6 is based on the fact that RG6 uses 75 ohms, F connector, suitable for Ghz frequency of TV / Satellite, rather than hamâs beloved 50 ohms SMA Voice communication standard.
Later Addition:
The DVB-T stick is designed for TV and uses 75 ohms system . Why shall we use 50 ohm system (antenna + coax) for its RF input?
LMR-400 is a trademark of TImes Microwave, so unless you are buying a knock-off it should meet the stated spec. There are various clones, but they usually have a similar, but different name.
Iâm not sure itâs really a prejudice, rather than it being a matter of using the right tool for the job. If you have a system that is 50 Ohm, then using 50 Ohm co-ax is the optimal way to do it. A 75 Ohm coax will work, with some varying penalty to performance depending on what quality coax you use. As with most things, there is a tradeoff between performance and cost, and it is up to the individual to decide where the balance lies.
Also, the input impedance of various rtl dongles depends on the manufacturer. The originals intended for use as TV receivers are likely 75 Ohm, but certainly the rtl-sdr.com variants are nominally 50 Ohm inputs, as are the airspys.
Isnât LMR cable manufactured by Times Microwave?
I guess if you are going to brand cheap coax with LMR you may as well brand it Times Microwave and make it completely counterfeit. Hence
That is a bit condescending. You try running a couple of KW over a transmission line that is just any old Rg6 with you- beaut type F connectors suitable for GHz and see what goes crackle, fizz, bang, corona followed by a very expensive flash bang.
This discussion is about receiving ADS-B signals, and power ovre coax is not more than miliwatts. Received signalâs power handling wise, RG6 coax, and even thin pigtails RG316 & RG174 are ok.
Is there anyone here in this forum who transmits 1090Mhz signal from ground?
All Generic DVB-T dongles (black or light blue) with MCX connector have 75 ohms input impedance.
Some dongles use PAL or SMA connector, but this does not change input impedance to 50 ohms, unless the manufacturer has modified the input circuitry also.
Iâve built 2.4GHz and 10GHz tranverters (down to 2m and 70cm respectively)
Iâve got an Andrews 100W amp for 2.1GHz retuned to 2.4GHz
(I think thatâs a âyesâ)
To get a sense of scale, the R820T chip is 4x4mm
The input pin is the bottom pin on the LHS
(imagine what that would look like connected to a 3mm track