Trial Run Results for Three Types of Whip Antennas


#1

Please scroll down to see the test result graphs at the bottom.

(1) The three antennas under test were:

(a) Coiled Whip
(b) Stock Whip
© Optimized Whip

(2) In order to minimize number of variables, only the removable parts of Whips were interchanged. All other hardware, location, and software/gain settings were identical. Even the same mag mount base & RG174 coax cable was used for all the three whips.

(3) In order to be sure that results are not influenced due to fluctuation in traffic, test were conducted twice.

(a) First test between 2pm & 3 pm
(b) Repeat test between 4pm & 5pm

Photo 1 - Three Antennas

Photo 2 - Test Setup

Photos 3 & 4 - Results of First Test

Photos 5 & 6 - Results of Repeat Test


Three Easy DIY Antennas for Beginners
Low message rate with Pro Stick
Mini mag mount antennas- What do you use as a ground plane?
Antenna fun and games
Antenna Specs
A good surprise from a cheap antenna!
#2

Great work. I have a couple I use in my basement setup. I will “Tune” them and see how they go.
:slight_smile:

Mine are on top of the basement window bars. Not sure how much for a ground plane it makes.


#3

The can I used in above experiment as ground plane, has 100mm (4 inches) dia.

I am planning a second round of tests.
Keeping same whip, I will try cans of larger & smaller dia: mag mount only which has 25 mm (1 inch) dia, cans of dia 50mm (2 inches), 75mm (3 inches), 100mm (4 inches) and 300 mm (12 inches).


#4

I believe your optimized aerial should be 67mm from where it screws into the base not 52mm.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk


#5

The antenna length is measured from the point the core wire of coax connects to it. That point is hidden inside the base and is 15 mm below the point where whip screws into the base, and is continuation of the brass screw. Hence the actual length of antenna is 15+52=67mm. Please see diagram below.


#6

Hmmm… maybe that’s my issue. I was getting worse response from a ~67mm copper wire attached to the base. I went longer by 5-10mm and got a better response.

BTW, how do you get those neat graphs? I’m familiar w/ rrdtool, but totally new to piware/dump1090 (like as of Friday new…)


#7

And for what it’s worth, I currently have nothing screwed to the base, and I’m tracking an plane nearly 60nm out! (This radio stuff is nothing but magic and fairy dust I tell ya…)


#8

Thanks I’ll get my wire cutters out again.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk


#9

I did not download and burn Piaware image on my microSD card. Instead I downloaded and burned “Raspbian Jessie Lite” from raspberrypi.org/downloads.

After burning the Raspbian Jessie image to my microSD card, I used an automated method (linked below) to install dump1090, 4 data feeders (flightaware, planefinder, flightradar24, and adsbexchange) and rrd graphs (web portal) which gives me the graphs you have seen.

The automated installation method I have used after burning Raspbian Jessie image, is given in the FIRST Post of this thread:

ADS-B Receiver Project Setup Scripts

Note: During installation of Web Portal, I did NOT choose Advanced option (MySQL and MySQL Lite) as it will quickly fill storage on my 8Gb microSD card by storing flight data continously. This does not affect creation & display of graphs.
.


#10

I reduced the length by 15mm as suggested and am getting 9% improvement on reports per aircraft over similar hourly period last week. Thanks abcd567.