Check if lighttpd is running (“sudo systemctl status lighttpd”)
Check if it is listening correctly on 80 and/or 8080 (“sudo netstat -ntap | grep LISTEN”)
Check if you can retrieve a page locally from the Pi (“wget -S localhost/dump1090-fa/”)
Another question would be what you have in /etc/lighttpd/conf-enabled/. It sounds like ligttpd is finding the default index.html page but not honoring the redirects.
My dump1090 web server works perfectly from inside my house AND from the internet thanks to a good configuration of my router.
But it does not work from my workplace where we have a proxy (Zscaler). The map and all the web page load then no plane is displayed with the message " Problem fetching data from dump1090."
Same problem here.
First I installed dump-1090 from raspbian buster.
The web-interface on http://192.168.1.21/dump1090/gmap.html worked well.
Then I installed other feeders: PiAware, opensky-network, planefinder, flightradar24, etc.
I think that the dump1090 was replaced by the dump1090-fa, or both are installed side by side?
All feeders are working correcly, same for http://192.168.1.21:8080/ (PiAware / FlightAware) and 192.168.1.21:30053/ (planefinder client).
My intention is that the web-interface is searching the plane data in dump1090 instead of dump1090-fa.
In this thread there were some discussions about this (remove dump1090 into init.d as dump1090-fa is now launched) but how is this to do for someone who isn’t very familiar with putty / bash?
How can I remove dump1090 from init.d?
“nano init.d” or “nano /etc/init.d” failed and I don’t want to damage the good working installation.
It will correct the fr24feed settings if they are wrong and fix the lighttpd configuration.
If you want the old dump1090-mutability interface, you can have that with dump1090-fa as well: Bundle install for dump1090fa · wiedehopf/adsb-scripts Wiki · GitHub
Or get the retro-interface on its own, it’s linked there.
The bundle also includes automatic gain adjustment you might not want.
[quote=“wiedehopf, post:32, topic:19049”]
So you were looking for the old interface?
I didn’t quite get from your post what exactly the problem was.[/quote]