Turning an obstacle into an advantage: Why is my northern coverage so good with an indoor antenna facing south?

I was puzzled for a while: why is my northern coverage so good when my antenna is placed at a south-facing window?

As you can see in the tar1090 coverage overlay image below, my direct path to the south is heavily blocked by a neighboring house right in front. Naturally, I expected poor reception in that direction.

However, it turns out that very same neighbor’s house is acting as an unexpected passive reflector! The signal bouncing off the building is actually boosting my coverage toward the north (the shadowed side of my house) much better than the direct path. Sometimes, a physical handicap can work entirely in your favor.

Have any of you experienced quirky multi-path or obstacle-reflection magic in your own setups?

In my limited expertise on this band, I believe the reason must be something else.

Except for very close aircraft, the received signal is too weak for a building to act as a reflector. Furthermore, for that to happen, the building’s construction material is crucial. Concrete and brick won’t reflect a weak signal; they’ll absorb it. However, if the concrete is reinforced with steel rods or any other material, its metallic nature allows it to act as a reflector.
If the building’s structure consists of steel pillars, they wouldn’t absorb the signal but would reflect it. Glass would simply allow the signal to pass through, attenuating its strength, although I’m not sure what to say about glass reinforced with metallic particles.

I also think that for that to happen, the building across the street would obviously have to be taller than yours, and those aircraft wouldn’t have to be very far away.

This is really interesting, but as I said, I’m giving my opinion using logic; I don’t know if it applies in this case, in that band and with weak signals.

1 Like

I’m thinking about something else, which might not make much sense, but I know perfectly well that in other bands, humidity in the air causes signals to behave differently; for example, tropospheric ducting is proof of that.

I don’t know if the humidity between the two buildings could be affecting it, or even the humidity covering the building across the street. I know the humidity in Japan very well… :hot_face:

Perhaps this theory isn’t as reasonable as the one I mentioned in my previous answer.

You should look for another possibility instead of signal bounces.

1 Like

That’s a very logical analysis, but interestingly, I see a similar phenomenon with a GPS dongle placed right next to my aviation antenna. Even satellites that should be shadowed behind my own house’s roof are reliably caught.

Here is a quick look at my xgps screen (connected via gpsd on my local machine). It seems environmental reflections and multipath are quite potent in practical, real-world indoor setups, beyond pure textbook theory!

1 Like

I’m really curious!
Is that building across from your antenna taller than yours? What material is it made of?

1 Like

Meanwhile, on the other hand, my TinyGS setup only sees the southern sky.

Unlike ADS-B or GPS reception where multipath and reflections can sneak around obstacles, the satellite signals here strictly follow line-of-sight — beautifully proving that my southern view is indeed blocked, and the northern ADS-B coverage really is the result of special reflection magic!

To give you an idea, here is the actual view from my setup. It’s a typical two-story Japanese residential house right in front, just like my own home!

Right foreground: The light-blue dongle for 1090MHz aircraft (ADS-B).
Middle: The little toy for TinyGS.
Left background: The small dongle for GPS.

I never said that was the cause; I only explained how radio waves behave in the presence of certain materials.

Honestly, I don’t think what you say you’re experiencing is the result of any reflection.

1 Like

Update: Wait, spoke too soon! :joy: Just caught a fresh pass from the north on TinyGS as well. Looks like reality is always full of surprises, and radio waves love to defy textbook expectations. Happy tracking, everyone!

1 Like

Wow, negative elevation angle. Some sort of ducting?

1 Like

Could be ducting, or some interesting multi-path/reflection magic!
Here is a snapshot of the raw packet list. As you can see, it’s not just a single lucky hit—there are multiple frames coming through consistently. Real-world RF is full of surprises!

1 Like

 

Yes, and documented it on Aug 3, 2015 in Planefinder Forums

 

 

3 Likes

@abcd567 Thank you for sharing that! When I saw your post and sketch about the Toronto airport reception behind those high-rise buildings, I literally slapped my knee in total agreement.

It’s amazing how real-world RF completely shatters textbook assumptions through glass reflections and multipath magic. Seeing your documented case gave me absolute confidence in what my own setup is experiencing. Thanks for keeping the discussion so insightful!

Great, as always, but I still maintain that ordinary glass doesn’t reflect any signals. If we’re talking about Toronto, I’m assuming it’s insulated glass, which contains a significant amount of metal, and although I wasn’t sure, you’ve confirmed that it reflects the signal, which makes sense. In a traditional Japanese house, there’s no steel, or if there is, it’s in very small quantities, and they don’t have special glass.

If what our friend SHIRAKAMI is experiencing are indeed signals coming from the opposite direction, I’d bet more on weather conditions and some kind of ducting effect (look at the image):

Or if your building is narrow and has thin walls, perhaps they’re coming right through.
It’s a mystery…

1 Like

Shifting gears a bit to look at the big picture from an RF perspective—how do our usual targets compare when we break down their altitude, frequency band, and transmission power?

I put together a quick comparison chart for TinyGS (LoRa satellites), GPS, and Aircraft (ADS-B):

It’s fascinating how vastly different these environments are, yet we pull them all into our home setups through windows and walls! What are your thoughts on how these different frequencies and link budgets behave?

As these are entering our homes through windows and walls, sure these are passing through our bodies as well.

It is more facinating that continous exposure to all these RF radiations do not harm us. :wink:

1 Like

For ADS-B at 1090 MHz, I thought the aircraft transponder power was more like 50 Watts. It should also be noted that there are two antennas on aircraft with ADS-B transponders one on top and one on bottom of aircraft. The one on top is for transmission to LEO satellites.

3 Likes

Well, Radio waves are non-ionizing radiation, so the only effect to the human body is possibly localized heating. For example, having a cell phone upside your head. Most ham radio operators have probably experienced RF burns from touching the wrong thing in a transmitter or transmitting antenna!

2 Likes

What the heck is going on here. I have deliberately pointed my antenna at the neigbours balcony across the yard who live at the top floor = > 350km without line of sight at the opposite side of which i can actually see something. Choose your reflecting obstacles wisely.

2 Likes

Back to normal today! The massive northern coverage we saw yesterday has completely vanished, and the map is back to its usual south/east pattern.

Looks like yesterday really was a textbook example of a temporary ducting/propagation anomaly. It’s amazing how volatile and shifting these 433 MHz paths can be day-to-day. Has anyone else tracked similar “ghost” openings in their TinyGS logs?