Today on approach to KGEG

Today 7/30/26 at noon I took this rather crappy phone image of this aircraft on approach to Spokane International (KGEG) runway 21. My phone camera doesn’t do well at full zoom. I made a mental note to look up the arrivals on FlightAware. After the Louisville MD-11 crash, I thought all those (and any airworthy DC-10’s) were effectively grounded indefinitely, so this was a huge surprise (the airworthiness directive originally did not have an approved compliance protocol, effectively grounding them. Maybe that has changed?). My initial thought was MD-11 but I’m not sure. It definitely is not a KC-10.

The picture itself isn’t really clear enough but this did not look like a military plane, maybe they could fly a grounded plane on a ferry waiver. Fairchild AFB is adjacent to Spokane International. For the past month I spend 3 hours a day, 3 days a week, watching from a good spot to see planes on both approaches (they intersect each other). This was very much on the Spokane approach, not Fairchild’s. Sometimes, military planes do lane at Spokane.

Even if this was on a ferry flight I figured there would still be an ADS-B record of it.

The Spokane airport arrivals list on their website doesn’t go back far enough for me to see.
Neither FlightAware and Flighradar24 have a record of this plane coming into Spokane at any time today, when looking by aircraft.

I suppose there is a small chance that is a military plane and it landed at Fairchild and I didn’t see it line up with that approach. But that is really not likely. I’ve seen a ton of planes on this approach

Hi,

30 JUL 2026 noon local = 1900 UTC

This aircraft was on short final then and touched down around 19:00:30. It looks like it was some type of test flight.

N974VV
OME10
DC10
hex = AD9470

Adsbexchange has some excellent playback features. It is easy to look at an area and play back all data at normal speed or multiple times speed.

FA does not show the track for this aircraft.

You can use the “History +” menu to check 30 July.

Regards,
-Dan

Actually, based on the aircraft and history, it was most likely just performing air refueling up near the border.

Regards,
-Dan

Many thanks, it is appreciated. I was kind of under the impression that Flightaware (FA) and Flightradar (FR) would always pick up the flight data if ADS-B Exchange also picked it up. Or rather, if flight data wasn’t blocked for ADS-B Exchange, then it wouldn’t be blocked for the other sites as well. The last month or two a fair number of interesting planes have landed at Spokane, and I couldn’t find any of them on FA or FR. I’ll have it check ADS-B Exchange first now.

  • Alan

Hi Alan,

Just a partial answer.

There are several different types of blocks.

FA, FR24, and the other public sites that also use official FAA data feeds honor blocking requests for aircraft owners that submit proof of ownership. That’s what the aircraft you saw did. The aircraft itself will still broadcast the correct mode-s code, which you can find on the FAA site for the registration. Anyone using a local receiver will receive and identify the aircraft just fine.

A year or so ago, the FAA started a privacy feature that only shows on the official FAA.gov registration page. Aircraft owners can choose to mask their name, address, and other personal details from that online page. If you look up an aircraft like this, the owner information will be completely blank. The rest of the aircraft details are still visible.

Corporations and others wanting FAA.gov registration privacy, and liability protection will often be registered as a corporation name or something like “N123 Flyers LLC”. That can hide the actual owner, but often private owners like that still use their home address, which doesn’t offer any privacy.

A few years back, the FAA started offering “SBS” blocking or obfuscation. With this, an aircraft requests a new, temporary mode-s code that does NOT identify their actual N-number tail. They program this code and then fly with it for a few months or so. When using the SBs code, you will visually see the painted N-number on the aircraft, but the transponder sends a mode-s code for the SBS identification. They also use a different voice callsign to hide the original identity.

You will receive a SBS mode-s code just fine. It will belong to an SBS N-number registration. If you look it up online at FAA.gov, it will show as something like “SBS program office”, so you know it’s a hidden ID. If you are able to match a visual N-number with a SBS mode-s code, then you can probably track that aircraft for a few months or so. The operator can use either the real mode-s code, or the temporary SBS mode-s code. Later, they can request a new SBS code. I don’t remember the exact timing, but I believe it’s a few months or so. Occasionally you will see an aircraft flying with an SBS mode-s code, but then incorrectly broadcasting their real “Flight ID” (normally N-number or callsign), which identifies the real aircraft. That’s a simple mistake on the transponder, and defeats the purpose of SBS.

Sites like adsbexchange will show SBS flights just fine, but make no attempt to do a matchup with the real aircraft.

If you’re curious, you can look up aircraft owner blocking on FA’s site. They explain how the owner requests it. You can also read about SBS at FAA.gov.

Reference aircraft in to Spokane. Remember that we are only talking about mode-s and ads-b aircraft. There are many military aircraft that fly mode-a/c only, even though they are ads-b equipped. Some even switch from ads-b to mode-a/c only during different phases of the mission. Mode-a/c position is much trickier, and you won’t be able to do anything with it on FA, FR24, or any of the more common big online sites.

You won’t see the mode-a/c only aircraft on the public sites, but you might occasionally see them when being rebroadcast as TIS-B by FAA ground sites using radar positions. The mode-s code for mode-a/c aircraft will be a pseudo code, and not actually identify the aircraft. I suspect your area likely has TIS-B and ADS-R rebroadcast. If you’re curious, you can search those terms and read about them.

Have fun watching. I think you are going to enjoy using adsbexchange and possibly some of the others that are similar.

Regards,
-Dan