The C-310 that crashed today


#1

**
I am surprised that there is NO mention of the C-310 that went in this morning taking out the 2 on board and 3 innocents on the ground.
The C 310 is and always has been a handful and may well be the most unsafe twin ever. This is the 3rd crash I can recall.**


#2

Ah, grasshopper, try looking at this:

discussions.flightaware.com/view … highlight=

and this:

discussions.flightaware.com/view … highlight=

You say this is the 3rd C310 crash. Without context, 3 crashes doesn’t make the aircraft unsafe. Is it the 3rd crash in 2 weeks? 3 months? 10 years? How many hours a year is the C310 fleet flown? If all of the C310s average 1000 hours a year then yes, it’s an unsafe aircraft. If they fleet averages 500,000 hours a year then the aircraft isn’t quite as unsafe.


#3

mduell, do that voodoo that you do and lock 2 of these 3 threads on the same topic, would ya?


#4

Pika gets the scoop on this one!


#5

Thanks wazzu…

I don’t care which 2 get locked, but this is getting out of hand…


#6

Thanks for your reply on the C-130.IYou make very good points.I found that is still a tricky plane to fly v.the C-340 I used to fly.
Also,WHY CAN’T I FIND THIS FLIGHT ORIGINATING FROM DAYTONA TO LAKELAND(BUT GOING INTO ORLANDO)ON FLIGHT AWARE?


#7

Because, your yelling aside, the aircraft is blocked as you can find out in the other discussions on this topic.


#8

Hello Damiross,
I am new to this site and to “email chatting” so I did not realize that I was,as you put it,“yelling”. Rather, I was just asking questions and looking for guidance and information.I will now refrain from using this as a means of communications as it can be very misunderstood.
Besides…I have a life that thankfully rests well above arguing with unknown and unimportant people on the internet.
Adios Dude!


#9

In emails and chats, no matter here or other places, all caps is considered yelling.