# KLM 737 question

**URL:** https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/klm-737-question/3175
**Category:** Airlines
**Created:** [April 4, 2007, 2:07am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/klm-737-question/3175 "2007-04-04T02:07:35Z")
**Posts on this page:** 12
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![shootblue](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/278dde/32.png) [@shootblue](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/shootblue)
#### Post date: [April 4, 2007, 2:07am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/klm-737-question/3175/1 "2007-04-04T02:07:35Z")

</div>

Is this right?

[flightaware.com/live/flight/KLM664](http://flightaware.com/live/flight/KLM664)

Isn’t the range a bit far for that plane?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![cfijames](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b487fb/32.png) [@cfijames](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/cfijames)
#### Post date: [April 4, 2007, 2:13am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/klm-737-question/3175/2 "2007-04-04T02:13:19Z")

</div>

It is correct, I beleive it is one of the BBJs operated by Privatair. Search the forums for privatair for more info.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![cfijames](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b487fb/32.png) [@cfijames](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/cfijames)
#### Post date: [April 4, 2007, 2:15am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/klm-737-question/3175/3 "2007-04-04T02:15:13Z")

</div>

I searched myself. Found this thread, among others.  
[discussions.flightaware.com/viewtopic.php?t=2205](http://discussions.flightaware.com/viewtopic.php?t=2205)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![damiross](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b9bd4f/32.png) [@damiross](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/damiross)
#### Post date: [April 4, 2007, 2:40am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/klm-737-question/3175/4 "2007-04-04T02:40:05Z")

</div>

> [@shootblue](#):
>
> Is this right?
> 
> [flightaware.com/live/flight/KLM664](http://flightaware.com/live/flight/KLM664)
> 
> Isn’t the range a bit far for that plane?

Not really. Looking at the map, it looks like it’s only about 4-6 inches.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![CessnaCitationX](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e480ec/32.png) [@CessnaCitationX](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/CessnaCitationX)
#### Post date: [April 4, 2007, 5:15am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/klm-737-question/3175/5 "2007-04-04T05:15:26Z")

</div>

> [@cfijames](#):
>
> It is correct, I believe it is one of the BBJs operated by Privatair. Search the forums for privatair for more info.

Check out the track log. That’s some serious _scheduled_ service! You’d think it was a regular flight.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![cfijames](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b487fb/32.png) [@cfijames](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/cfijames)
#### Post date: [April 4, 2007, 2:16pm UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/klm-737-question/3175/6 "2007-04-04T14:16:16Z")

</div>

> [@CessnaCitationX](#):
>
> > [@cfijames](#):
> >
> > It is correct, I believe it is one of the BBJs operated by Privatair. Search the forums for privatair for more info.
> 
> Check out the track log. That’s some serious _scheduled_ service! You’d think it was a regular flight.

I don’t understand. It _is_ scheduled service, it is not a private charter. Privatair and KLM have an agreement to offer the service as a “first class _plus_” type of thing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![planeaholic](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discussions.flightaware.com/planeaholic/32/130535_2.png) [@planeaholic](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/planeaholic)
#### Post date: [April 4, 2007, 2:17pm UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/klm-737-question/3175/7 "2007-04-04T14:17:06Z")

</div>

FA needs a filter to screen out redundant questions. Wouldn’t that be nice? If someone could figure that out, the world would be a little bit better place…the cyber world, anyway.😒

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JJ11](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discussions.flightaware.com/jj11/32/118073_2.png) [@JJ11](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/JJ11)
#### Post date: [April 12, 2007, 11:06pm UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/klm-737-question/3175/8 "2007-04-12T23:06:16Z")

</div>

I blieve it’s incorrect. Boeing 737-700’s don’t travel very long distances. That route would need a Boeing 747, 757, 767 or a 777 also A340’s .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![mduell](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discussions.flightaware.com/mduell/32/115680_2.png) [@mduell](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/mduell)
#### Post date: [April 12, 2007, 11:24pm UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/klm-737-question/3175/9 "2007-04-12T23:24:25Z")

</div>

> [@JJ11](#):
>
> I blieve it’s incorrect. Boeing 737-700’s don’t travel very long distances. That route would need a Boeing 747, 757, 767 or a 777 also A340’s .

They’re using BBJ (73G based) and BBJ2 (738 based) aircraft, which easily have the range for these missions. See the [Privatair website](http://www.privatair.com/airline_services/currentservices.html) for more information.

Also the newest [737-700ER has a range of 5510nm](http://www.boeing.com/commercial/737family/737-700ER/facts.html), which allows for transpacific flights (e.g. New York to Japan or Los Angeles to China).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![wazzu90](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/bc79bd/32.png) [@wazzu90](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/wazzu90)
#### Post date: [April 13, 2007, 3:53am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/klm-737-question/3175/10 "2007-04-13T03:53:36Z")

</div>

> [@mduell](#):
>
> Also the newest [737-700ER has a range of 5510nm](http://www.boeing.com/commercial/737family/737-700ER/facts.html), which allows for transpacific flights (e.g. New York to Japan or Los Angeles to China).

I would start seeing monsters on the wing on those flights.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![NeedleNose](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discussions.flightaware.com/needlenose/32/86946_2.png) [@NeedleNose](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/NeedleNose)
#### Post date: [April 13, 2007, 5:57am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/klm-737-question/3175/11 "2007-04-13T05:57:04Z")

</div>

[quote=“wazzu90”]

> [@mduell](#):
>
> Also the newest [737-700ER has a range of 5510nm](http://www.boeing.com/commercial/737family/737-700ER/facts.html)[/quote]
> 
> , which allows for transpacific flights (e.g. New York to Japan or Los Angeles to China).
> 
> I would start seeing monsters on the wing on those flights.

![](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/uploads/flightaware/original/3X/d/5/d501c441f7bfbd1fc29766c1437e59c437343c84.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![sbord](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/59ef9b/32.png) [@sbord](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/sbord)
#### Post date: [April 13, 2007, 11:58am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/klm-737-question/3175/12 "2007-04-13T11:58:42Z")

</div>

Privateair flies for Luth. using … Airbus 320 's. The smaller plane used for Ted. Fewer Passengers , lighter load .
