Define beauty. The 787 and 777 are attractive. Go find a picture of a comet… Or a ford trimotor… Better yet, get mom and dad to take you to the NASM ASAP… Understand the heritage of aviation and where it’s come from before you fall in love with the newest of the new.
Find out, for yourself, why that airplane has all the windows on its nose… Then you’ll appreciate it’s beauty.
Not ugly. Not quite as good looking as a C-141 but still good looking.
The 777, 767, A330, and many other twin engine planes produced today are just boring. As jimcander says, there are, in his (and my) opinion) many more beautiful planes.
Comet
Boeing 727
Boeing 737-100 and -200
DC-8, especially the -61 and -63 but not the 70 series
Boeing 707 and its brother the 720
Airbus A340
VC-10
IL-62
And, with the exception of the A340, these jets sounded like real jets, not pansies.
Go to Wikipedia to look at these aircraft and their histories.
And that’s just the jets. There’s many prop and turboprops I think are much better looking than the boring crop of jetliners like the 737NG, Airbus A320 family, etc.
naw, no need. We used to do a lot of Low Level reccee that were below treetop, as he demonstrated some of his photo runs. Now when Im old an gray
I feel like I dodge a bullet, but back then at 19 I thought it was great fun. Except for explaining how Palm fronds got into the wing tips to the skipper .
It does not seem ugly, I think it’s spectacular, a very rare plane in Spain (comes sometimes from Equatorial Guinea) and the sharp sound of its four engines not leave you indifferent …
I thought it was a fine looking plane. I was fascinated by how it would seem to just be suspended in mid-air, hanging there, while it was actually descending forward.