Tar1090 showed me more flights at around 90 nm, but graphs1090 states peak range as 65 nm how’s that possible? Opensky-networks showing a distance at 103 nm/191 km…
It’s by now an indoor setup obstructed by other buildings etc… Will need to get the antenna outside.
As far as i understand graphs1090 is calculating the peak average over the given time you’re looking at.
I’ve seen a similar behavior, but i decided to not care about these details.
1 Like
Wise attitude. Makes life peaceful.
1 Like
Well, the raw data should be the same i guess. It’s a really big difference. Does the messagerate, cpuload, etc. work i graphs1090. Or is it tar1090 that is wrong?
Peak should not be an avarage. Take a look, it draws a line where it peaked.
graphs1090 will only consider ADS-B aircraft.
Also it only checks once a minute.
That may be the reason… See the attached screenshots. Graphs1090 is set to 8 hours while taking the screenshot.
yeah that seems strange.
no clue what’s going on.
This topic was automatically closed 365 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.