# Flight Tracking Part 3 **URL:** \ **Category:** Notable Activity\ **Created:** [November 11, 2006, 2:08am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331 "2006-11-11T02:08:36Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![julested](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/90db22/32.png) [@julested](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/julested)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2006, 2:08am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/1 "2006-11-11T02:08:36Z")
Seems I cant post a subject without being removed? Thats a shame. As stated earlier, Flightaware is a great site and my question was answered by Dami. Flightaware people watchers must be pretty bored to remove a post that is not a problem in any way, shape, or form… ---
**Author:** ![CessnaCitationX](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e480ec/32.png) [@CessnaCitationX](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/CessnaCitationX)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2006, 2:47am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/2 "2006-11-11T02:47:18Z")
> [@julested](#): > > Seems I cant post a subject without being removed? Thats a shame. As stated earlier, Flightaware is a great site and my question was answered by Dami. > > Flightaware people watchers must be pretty bored to remove a post that is not a problem in any way, shape, or form… ```auto Sounds like blitzer. ``` What Mark did was appropriate. You had your question answered in the first reply. (Including this one.) That’s pretty good. Most of my threads don’t get totally answered in the first 5 replies. > [@julested](#): > > Seems I cant post a subject without being removed? Thats a shame. To answer your question, mostly no. > [@julested](#): > > Flightaware people watchers must be pretty bored to remove a post that is not a problem in any way, shape, or form… Yes, it is (until this thread is locked) a problem in _every_ way, shape, or form… ---
**Author:** ![Newark777](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/54ee81/32.png) [@Newark777](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/Newark777)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2006, 2:48am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/3 "2006-11-11T02:48:44Z")
> [@julested](#): > > Flightaware people watchers must be pretty bored to remove a post that is not a problem in any way, shape, or form… This is the second topic of yours that is utterly pointless and serves no purpose. Why do you feel the need to keep commenting in new threads about how your original topic got answered? We got it, we all read it. Time to be quiet until you have something valuable to say. ---
**Author:** ![lancasterperch](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discussions.flightaware.com/lancasterperch/32/109770_2.png) [@lancasterperch](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/lancasterperch)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2006, 3:09am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/4 "2006-11-11T03:09:04Z")
> [@julested](#): > > Seems I cant post a subject without being removed? Thats a shame. As stated earlier, Flightaware is a great site and my question was answered by Dami. > > Flightaware people watchers must be pretty bored to remove a post that is not a problem in any way, shape, or form… Part one was answered. I respect **mduell’s** response and understand his reasoning behind a complete block. Part two is a mystery to me and everyone else. Part three brings up a good point if not in a very superficial and somewhat shallow way. The point being what can / cannot be discussed in these forums. To date the discussions have been wide ranging and very informative. Of course there is an edicate to follow, just like everywhere else in life. However, I hope that discussion is not stiffled because of the acceptability of the topic. Is the posting of celebreties rides acceptable? Government flights other than military? Flight patterns in and out of major airports? I am in no way defending **julested** , I just see a window of posibilities which might make these discussion forums less open to discussion. Maybe I’m making too much of this? ---
**Author:** ![julested](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/90db22/32.png) [@julested](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/julested)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2006, 3:17am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/5 "2006-11-11T03:17:30Z")
I understand, just as usual, I need to have thicker skin. Still dont think it needed to be locked though. Thanks for the replys. I appreciate it. By the way,777 boy, I always have something valuable to say. ---
**Author:** ![Newark777](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/54ee81/32.png) [@Newark777](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/Newark777)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2006, 3:32am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/6 "2006-11-11T03:32:09Z")
> [@julested](#): > > By the way,777 boy, I always have something valuable to say. Doesn’t sound like it to me. Also sounds like you have a serious case of smug. And it’s Mr. 777 to you. ---
**Author:** ![nugget](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discussions.flightaware.com/nugget/32/102_2.png) [@nugget](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/nugget)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2006, 3:49am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/7 "2006-11-11T03:49:55Z")
Alright, show’s over folks. I’d hate to have to lock this thread and prompt a “Flight tracking 4” rebuttal. ---
**Author:** ![CessnaCitationX](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e480ec/32.png) [@CessnaCitationX](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/CessnaCitationX)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2006, 6:05am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/8 "2006-11-11T06:05:29Z")
[quote=“Newark777”] > [@julested](#): > > By the way,777 **boy** [/quote] > > , > > And it’s Mr. 777 to you. That’s Mr. Cessna 750 [seven-fifty] to you. …not CCX or CitationX! 😃 I’ll give julested a Jr. rating in humor. Dave, you have an apprentice. > [@nugget](#): > > Alright, show’s over folks. I’d hate to have to lock this thread and prompt a “Flight tracking 4” rebuttal. Yeah, really! 😉 (I’m still waiting for your 50th post.) ```auto ETA for nugget's 50th post approx 20 days iff posting 0.10 posts per day. Scheduled for December 1st, 2006. ``` ---
**Author:** ![pika1000](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discussions.flightaware.com/pika1000/32/124076_2.png) [@pika1000](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/pika1000)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2006, 3:13pm UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/9 "2006-11-11T15:13:09Z")
> [@julested](#): > > Seems I cant post a subject without being removed? Thats a shame. As stated earlier, Flightaware is a great site and my question was answered by Dami. > > Flightaware people watchers must be pretty bored to remove a post that is not a problem in any way, shape, or form… Was the the “WAAAAbulance” I just heard go by? ---
**Author:** ![damiross](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b9bd4f/32.png) [@damiross](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/damiross)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2006, 4:41pm UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/10 "2006-11-11T16:41:25Z")
> [@julested](#): > > Thanks for the replys. I appreciate it. > > By the way,777 boy, I always have something valuable to say. This reminds me of an ex-girlfriend. She said she was never rude and always helpful and she let others know that. She was, by the way, neither! The plural of reply is replies. ---
**Author:** ![CessnaCitationX](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e480ec/32.png) [@CessnaCitationX](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/CessnaCitationX)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2006, 5:22pm UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/11 "2006-11-11T17:22:34Z")
> [@damiross](#): > > > [@julested](#): > > > > Thanks for the replys. I appreciate it. > > > > By the way,777 boy, I always have something valuable to say. > > This reminds of an ex-girlfriend. > > The plural of reply is replies. The subject of your _non_-sentance is missing! Let’s try… "This reminds **me** of an ex-girlfriend. ---
**Author:** ![damiross](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b9bd4f/32.png) [@damiross](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/damiross)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2006, 5:39pm UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/12 "2006-11-11T17:39:00Z")
I love the edit button in this forum. In other words, I fixed the sentence. ---
**Author:** ![JHEM](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discussions.flightaware.com/jhem/32/9683_2.png) [@JHEM](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/JHEM)\ **Post date:** [November 11, 2006, 7:40pm UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/13 "2006-11-11T19:40:30Z")
> [@CessnaCitationX](#): > > The subject of your _non_-sentance is missing! Let’s try… "This reminds **me** of an ex-girlfriend. The **me** is implied in the inital post and somewhat redundant in the edited version. “This reminds of an ex-girlfriend” can stand by itself just as readily as “This is reminiscent of an ex-girlfriend”. In either instance it can be read as a given that the author (Dami) is referring to an ex-girlfriend of his and a memory of his. ---
**Author:** ![CessnaCitationX](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e480ec/32.png) [@CessnaCitationX](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/CessnaCitationX)\ **Post date:** [November 12, 2006, 1:37am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/14 "2006-11-12T01:37:15Z")
> [@damiross](#): > > I love the edit button in this forum. In other words, I fixed the sentence. But I quoted your original post. 😈 (I paraphrased JHEM since I couldn’t find his version of it.) ---
**Author:** ![julested](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/90db22/32.png) [@julested](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/julested)\ **Post date:** [November 12, 2006, 7:24am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/15 "2006-11-12T07:24:17Z")
I have learned alot from these forums. From Dami and many others. Be thick skinned and dont take it personal like I did. I assume that Newark777 flys those big boys, maybe not. My best friend out here in Denver flys those babies out of DEN/DIA Either way, 1984 Big Brother was watching for sure from his post in TX at the Flightaware headqurters. Therfore I kept my mouth shut after he slammed the door last night. ---
**Author:** ![tobyz1](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discussions.flightaware.com/tobyz1/32/126238_2.png) [@tobyz1](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/tobyz1)\ **Post date:** [November 13, 2006, 4:18am UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/16 "2006-11-13T04:18:28Z")
> [@CessnaCitationX](#): > > The subject of your _non_-sentance is missing! Let’s try… "This reminds **me** of an ex-girlfriend. As long as we’re getting grammatical… It was the **object** of the verb ‘reminds’ that was initially missing. The **subject** has always been there. “This” ---
**Author:** ![planeaholic](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discussions.flightaware.com/planeaholic/32/130535_2.png) [@planeaholic](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/planeaholic)\ **Post date:** [November 13, 2006, 2:27pm UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/17 "2006-11-13T14:27:04Z")
Can I file a motion to rename the subject of this discussion “The Thread that Refused to Die?” 😠😠 ---
**Author:** ![pika1000](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discussions.flightaware.com/pika1000/32/124076_2.png) [@pika1000](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/pika1000)\ **Post date:** [November 13, 2006, 4:51pm UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/18 "2006-11-13T16:51:56Z")
> [@planeaholic](#): > > Can I file a motion to rename the subject of this discussion “The Thread that Refused to Die?” 😠😠 2nd… ---
**Author:** ![damiross](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b9bd4f/32.png) [@damiross](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/damiross)\ **Post date:** [November 13, 2006, 5:01pm UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/19 "2006-11-13T17:01:29Z")
Do we need to vote aye or nay or can we just do it by acclamation? ---
**Author:** ![pika1000](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discussions.flightaware.com/pika1000/32/124076_2.png) [@pika1000](https://discussions.flightaware.com/u/pika1000)\ **Post date:** [November 13, 2006, 6:13pm UTC](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331/20 "2006-11-13T18:13:01Z")
Move consensus… [Next page](https://discussions.flightaware.com/t/flight-tracking-part-3/2331.md?page=2)