• Join FlightAware (Why Join?)
• Login
• Username or E-mail address Password Login

  Join FlightAware (Free Registration) | Forgot Username/Password Cancel
• العربية Čeština Deutsch English (Australia) English (Canada) English (UK) English (USA) Español (España) Español Suomi Français (Canada) Français (France) עִבְרִית हिन्दी Hrvatski Italiano 日本語 한국어 Nederlands Polski Português (Brasil) Português (Portugal) Русский Svenska Türkçe 中文(简体) 中文(香港) 中文(台灣)

   

View unanswered posts | View active topics

Page 1 of 1

[ 8 posts ]

Print view Previous topic | Next topic

Author	Message
nkar	Post subject: This must be a mistake Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 1:06 pm
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 9:25 am Posts: 5	I am guessing that this is a mistake with the aircraft identification for UAL 1289 from BOS - SFO. I highly doubt it was a 737-200. http://flightaware.com/live/flight/UAL1289
Top

drdisque	Post subject: Re: This must be a mistake Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 1:26 pm
Charter Member Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 10:00 pm Posts: 1112	United has been sending 737-800 Overwater to Flightaware as a different code than they used to. It hasn't been fixed in Flightaware's system yet.
Top

nkar	Post subject: Re: This must be a mistake Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 1:30 pm
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 9:25 am Posts: 5	Makes sense. Thanks!
Top

dbrooks84	Post subject: Re: This must be a mistake Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 6:23 pm
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2011 12:19 pm Posts: 12	I recently noted that a UA (CO) B737 flight identified as 73S or 737-200. I have a picture of the aircraft and it is indeed a B737-724(WL) using the registration number, I tracked it down and the entry for the aircraft in the FAA registry is wrong! The FAA lists it as B737-224.
Top

mduell	Post subject: Re: This must be a mistake Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 1:29 pm
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:00 pm Posts: 4710 Location: FAWHQ	Please search the forum before starting a new thread. http://discussions.flightaware.com/view ... 58#p135259
Top

rw812	Post subject: Re: This must be a mistake Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 2:30 pm
FlightAware Member Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:00 am Posts: 1580 Location: damiross.net	mduell wrote: Please search the forum before starting a new thread. viewtopic.php?f=7&t=14358#p135259 And when you search the forum, it's often better to use Google rather than the forum's search engine. Add the suffix "site: flightaware.com" to your search terms (no quotation marks).
Top

mduell	Post subject: Re: This must be a mistake Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 3:35 pm
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:00 pm Posts: 4710 Location: FAWHQ	rw812 wrote: mduell wrote: Please search the forum before starting a new thread. http://discussions.flightaware.com/view ... 58#p135259 And when you search the forum, it's often better to use Google rather than the forum's search engine. Add the suffix "site: flightaware.com" to your search terms (no quotation marks). site:discussions.flightaware.com works even better.
Top

scottnearsmf	Post subject: Re: This must be a mistake Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 7:44 pm
FlightAware Member Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:00 pm Posts: 116	At 7:40 PM CDT on May 19th, Flightaware was still showing 12 737-200s airborne.
Top

Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending

Page 1 of 1

[ 8 posts ]