| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pika1000 Charter Member

Joined: 01 Nov 2005 Posts: 2108 Location: KTUL/KRVS via BFL/MIT
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cloudchaser67 wrote: | | Still find this whole incident disturbing. Out of curiosity, if someone that is a pilot as a profession gets a DUI does that need to be reported? |
Yes. What is it FAR 91.17 or something like that.
Edit: Check that. Can I get some clarification on this one? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cloudchaser67
Joined: 24 Nov 2008 Posts: 4 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I guess I should rephrase that, if the DUI is received operating a motor vehicle does it need to be reported? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JHEM FlightAware Member

Joined: 21 Mar 2006 Posts: 4193 Location: N14 KVAY
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Commercial Pilots who are convicted of DUI / DWI must report that conviction on his or her medical application at time of renewal. He or she must also notify the FAA Civil Security Division, at the following address ONLY:
FAA
Civil Action Security Division (AMC-700)
P.O. Box 25810
Oklahoma City, OK 73125
They must be notified no later than 60 days after the motor vehicle action. Contacting the local FAA FSDO, or the disclosure on the medical certificate, is not compliance under the rule. A pilot must also report any action taken on his driver's license that emanated from the drunk driving arrest, i.e., a suspension for either failing the breath / blood alcohol test or for refusing a test. This report, too, is made to the FAA Oklahoma Office Civil Security Division and must be made within 60 days of the suspension. In cases where a pilot suffers both a DUI / DWI conviction as well as an administrative license suspension that arose out of the same factual circumstances, he must timely report both of them to the Security Division or face a non-reporting violation. FAR 61.15 (d) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wazzu90 FlightAware Member

Joined: 30 Aug 2006 Posts: 3789 Location: YKM - Yakima, WA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dadalope wrote: | | It only took an hour to stain two entire careers, and the sad part is they have many long years left to regret it. |
That's about 57 minutes longer than it takes to kill hundreds of people in most airline crashes. These pilots lost their career but they will live to cry about it. Maybe they'll get their own reality show now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cloudchaser67
Joined: 24 Nov 2008 Posts: 4 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks JHEM. The individual is a Part 135. Has had 2 one in a car and one operating a boat.
Enrolled in counseling and once that was completed supposedly removed from driving record.
Just concerns me how many other situations there are out there like this.
You spend big bucks for the counseling program and then no worries?
And the FAA knows nothing about it? Scary. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Beechluvr FlightAware Member

Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 434 Location: KHRO
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
You know... cant help but wonder since this incident, how many times during boarding some sapp of a passenger, and you know the ones i'm talking about, the know it all non-pilot smart asses, are poking thier heads in the cockpit saying some smart ass crap like "stay awake guys" or "no laptops in the cockpit boys" trying to be cute.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cloudchaser67
Joined: 24 Nov 2008 Posts: 4 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kid you not, I was boarding an aircraft the other day and I head 3 people make similiar comments. I felt bad for the guys as I was one of the first groups to board and I am sure there more smart a** remarks to come. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NeedleNose FlightAware Member

Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 2636 Location: KOKV
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Can we now refer to NWA as "NORDO WEST"? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Beechluvr FlightAware Member

Joined: 17 Aug 2009 Posts: 434 Location: KHRO
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think I would be shutting the door to the cockpit right before they board. I dont have the patience to deal with the FOCKERS. Hence, why I'm not a commercial pilot. My hats off to you guys flying the line that are on here. The bulls&*% you have to endure. I would've been fired long ago in my 30s much less now for punching some whiny ass or telling a woman to bite me beeeotch! But thats just me.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MeekRN FlightAware Member

Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Posts: 377 Location: 0Q5
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| in the begining of this thread it was sounding like missing ATC comms was normal im glad to see most agree the pilots were sleeping. This does not meam that anybody in this forum is a bad person. Yes im sure the aviation industry would rather this not be public knowledge but the public would rather their pilots were not sleeping at the yoke. i remember back in the day when the pilot would take a walk thru the isles shaking hands ( great PR). Wall mart says they have 30% less theft when they put an employee at their front door making eye contact with customers when they walk in the door. Hospitals have less litagation when the patients family meets the doctors nurses and even floor managers daily. its bad that a pilot sleeps, its worse that they lie about it, and its even worse when the pilots lies are swept under the carpet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MeekRN FlightAware Member

Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Posts: 377 Location: 0Q5
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cloudchaser67 wrote: | | Kid you not, I was boarding an aircraft the other day and I head 3 people make similiar comments. I felt bad for the guys as I was one of the first groups to board and I am sure there more smart a** remarks to come. |
and now i can imagine the flight attendants trying to tell passengers to turn off their computers and electronic devices cause it can intefere with navigaiton equipment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dadalope FlightAware Member

Joined: 16 Jan 2009 Posts: 405 Location: kbjc
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| wazzu90 wrote: | | dadalope wrote: | | It only took an hour to stain two entire careers, and the sad part is they have many long years left to regret it. |
That's about 57 minutes longer than it takes to kill hundreds of people in most airline crashes. These pilots lost their career but they will live to cry about it. Maybe they'll get their own reality show now. |
Evidently my comment was not clear, because it drew two "correcting" responses. First, look at this. Then let me clarify that I was marveling again how one really stupid moment can ruin your life. Each pilot had a successful career including more than 20,000 hours for one and 10,000 for the other, and each was less than 7 years from retirement. But for one hour they forgot what they were about, and now it's all in the toilet.
There are lots of ways a stupid mistake can change your life in an instant. I'd bet most of them occur in a car with only a handful of people directly involved. This one fortunately caused no injuries. And that's why I applaud ATC for being there to maintain separation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MeekRN FlightAware Member

Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Posts: 377 Location: 0Q5
|
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I wonder if the outcome would be any differnet had they told the truth. But this way they take liability away from the airline (somewhat), which might pay dividends later. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
robbreid FlightAware Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 2086 Location: Toronto
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nov 3/09 (AP) -- On Capitol Hill, lawmakers are moving to prohibit the use of computer laptops in airline cockpits.
The idea is to prevent another incident like the one in which a Northwest Airlines plane overshot Minneapolis by 150 miles.
Sen. Byron Dorgan, the chairman of the aviation subcommittee, says his staff is working on a bill that he expects to introduce in about a week.
Dorgan says the incident proves this sort of thing can happen and there ought to be a more clear understanding by everyone in the cockpit that they need to take it seriously.
Several other senators are expressing their support. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WiserTime07 FlightAware Member
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 268 Location: KLRO
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| robbreid wrote: | Nov 3/09 (AP) -- On Capitol Hill, lawmakers are moving to prohibit the use of computer laptops in airline cockpits.
The idea is to prevent another incident like the one in which a Northwest Airlines plane overshot Minneapolis by 150 miles.
Sen. Byron Dorgan, the chairman of the aviation subcommittee, says his staff is working on a bill that he expects to introduce in about a week.
Dorgan says the incident proves this sort of thing can happen and there ought to be a more clear understanding by everyone in the cockpit that they need to take it seriously.
Several other senators are expressing their support. |
That's stupid - laptops had nothing to do with this whole situation. If they're going to fix things, why don't they put a closed circuit camera aimed back at the pilots, keep the whole cockpit drenched in extremely bright light to keep them awake or install a deadman's switch similar to locomotives? I'm taking it that the politician's have either fallen for this scenario or have been "persuaded" to believe this story by lobbyists? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flyboy97222 FlightAware Member

Joined: 20 Jun 2007 Posts: 1310 Location: N26 11'56.06 W80 07'49.99
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| WiserTime07 wrote: | | robbreid wrote: | Nov 3/09 (AP) -- On Capitol Hill, lawmakers are moving to prohibit the use of computer laptops in airline cockpits.
The idea is to prevent another incident like the one in which a Northwest Airlines plane overshot Minneapolis by 150 miles.
Sen. Byron Dorgan, the chairman of the aviation subcommittee, says his staff is working on a bill that he expects to introduce in about a week.
Dorgan says the incident proves this sort of thing can happen and there ought to be a more clear understanding by everyone in the cockpit that they need to take it seriously.
Several other senators are expressing their support. |
That's stupid - laptops had nothing to do with this whole situation. If they're going to fix things, why don't they put a closed circuit camera aimed back at the pilots, keep the whole cockpit drenched in extremely bright light to keep them awake or install a deadman's switch similar to locomotives? I'm taking it that the politician's have either fallen for this scenario or have been "persuaded" to believe this story by lobbyists? |
Better yet JUST FLY A BOEING! if you don't touch something or make a radio call every 15min the AC talks to you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MeekRN FlightAware Member

Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Posts: 377 Location: 0Q5
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Im sure its hard to stay awake when you have the health and safety of hundereds of trusting individuals lifes in your hands. i only have 2 lifes in my hands when im at work, and im always on edge. The reason they fell asleep is because lap tops are NOT allowed to be used in cockpits. i dont care what my pilot is doing as long as he is awake.
now that cockpit doors are locked, are there ever any male and female pilot combinations? i have only ever seen man pilots. I think it would be fun to join the 5 mile high club in the cockpit, while getting paid, and the pax were sound asleep. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Smerkbich
Joined: 21 Jul 2009 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| will744 wrote: | | Guess you are say'in you're perfect? |
Every charter pilot I've asked has admitted to nodding off at the controls... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tyketto FlightAware Member
Joined: 19 Mar 2007 Posts: 472
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| flyboy97222 wrote: | | WiserTime07 wrote: | | robbreid wrote: | Nov 3/09 (AP) -- On Capitol Hill, lawmakers are moving to prohibit the use of computer laptops in airline cockpits.
The idea is to prevent another incident like the one in which a Northwest Airlines plane overshot Minneapolis by 150 miles.
Sen. Byron Dorgan, the chairman of the aviation subcommittee, says his staff is working on a bill that he expects to introduce in about a week.
Dorgan says the incident proves this sort of thing can happen and there ought to be a more clear understanding by everyone in the cockpit that they need to take it seriously.
Several other senators are expressing their support. |
That's stupid - laptops had nothing to do with this whole situation. If they're going to fix things, why don't they put a closed circuit camera aimed back at the pilots, keep the whole cockpit drenched in extremely bright light to keep them awake or install a deadman's switch similar to locomotives? I'm taking it that the politician's have either fallen for this scenario or have been "persuaded" to believe this story by lobbyists? |
Better yet JUST FLY A BOEING! if you don't touch something or make a radio call every 15min the AC talks to you. |
A/C type still wouldn't have anything to do with it, as you would easily know.
I was recently on a SWA flight, SMF-BUR-LAS. I stopped at the flight deck on the layover to talk to the pilots, told them I was a student pilot, and they let me sit in the left seat. the FO was using a tablet PC (could easily be a laptop) to get their numbers for the next leg of the flight. They need to have access to that type of info even in mid-flight. I know for a fact that some of them even have to go back and recheck their numbers to see if they can take an intersection departure should ATC ask if they can.
Stupid bill like this would send them all back at least 5 years.
BL. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MeekRN FlightAware Member

Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Posts: 377 Location: 0Q5
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| no im saying if you want to sleep on the job, dont do so with people whos lives are depending on you staying awake/alert/fit for duty. get a job in an office, or where you failing wont get someone killed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flyboy97222 FlightAware Member

Joined: 20 Jun 2007 Posts: 1310 Location: N26 11'56.06 W80 07'49.99
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| tyketto wrote: | | flyboy97222 wrote: | | WiserTime07 wrote: | | robbreid wrote: | Nov 3/09 (AP) -- On Capitol Hill, lawmakers are moving to prohibit the use of computer laptops in airline cockpits.
The idea is to prevent another incident like the one in which a Northwest Airlines plane overshot Minneapolis by 150 miles.
Sen. Byron Dorgan, the chairman of the aviation subcommittee, says his staff is working on a bill that he expects to introduce in about a week.
Dorgan says the incident proves this sort of thing can happen and there ought to be a more clear understanding by everyone in the cockpit that they need to take it seriously.
Several other senators are expressing their support. |
That's stupid - laptops had nothing to do with this whole situation. If they're going to fix things, why don't they put a closed circuit camera aimed back at the pilots, keep the whole cockpit drenched in extremely bright light to keep them awake or install a deadman's switch similar to locomotives? I'm taking it that the politician's have either fallen for this scenario or have been "persuaded" to believe this story by lobbyists? |
Better yet JUST FLY A BOEING! if you don't touch something or make a radio call every 15min the AC talks to you. |
A/C type still wouldn't have anything to do with it, as you would easily know.
I was recently on a SWA flight, SMF-BUR-LAS. I stopped at the flight deck on the layover to talk to the pilots, told them I was a student pilot, and they let me sit in the left seat. the FO was using a tablet PC (could easily be a laptop) to get their numbers for the next leg of the flight. They need to have access to that type of info even in mid-flight. I know for a fact that some of them even have to go back and recheck their numbers to see if they can take an intersection departure should ATC ask if they can.
Stupid bill like this would send them all back at least 5 years.
BL. |
NO NO NO- their electronic flight bag will not be affected.
If you read my post you will find that type has everything to do with what I was talking about. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MeekRN FlightAware Member

Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Posts: 377 Location: 0Q5
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
| this is what happens when the pilots lie to cover up a error, they were sound asleep and are trying to use an excuse of using computers and got distracted. if a bill/law is passed its because the pilots lied not because the officials knee jerked. if the pilots dont lie, the officials dont knee jerk. if the pilots tell the truth maybe the law makers require pilots to make overt actions once a while, thats a much better knew jerk that the lying pilots are forcing the law makers to do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
davysims
Joined: 09 Oct 2009 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| robbreid wrote: | Nov 3/09 (AP) -- On Capitol Hill, lawmakers are moving to prohibit the use of computer laptops in airline cockpits.
The idea is to prevent another incident like the one in which a Northwest Airlines plane overshot Minneapolis by 150 miles.
Sen. Byron Dorgan, the chairman of the aviation subcommittee, says his staff is working on a bill that he expects to introduce in about a week.
Dorgan says the incident proves this sort of thing can happen and there ought to be a more clear understanding by everyone in the cockpit that they need to take it seriously.
Several other senators are expressing their support. |
Just another stupid knee jerk reaction from our wonderful Congress. They can't figure anything else out, but they have to time to respond to every aircraft incident that makes the news. When is the last time a Senator was so involved in passing legislation to prevent car accidents from sleeping? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
robbreid FlightAware Member
Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 2086 Location: Toronto
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|